Setup context
Stand configuration, device state, operator choices, scripts, and fixture assumptions.
First step – free
Map one embedded test workflow in 30-45 minutes
Use the kit to make setup, handoff, and evidence gaps visible before you buy another tool or start a migration discussion.
The kit is designed for embedded teams that already depend on serious tools and need a clearer picture of one painful workflow. It does not ask for confidential test data and it does not assume a tool replacement.
Work through the templates with one workflow owner and one engineer who knows the actual stand setup. Keep the output narrow enough that it can be reviewed in a workflow conversation.
Time30-45 minutes
ScopeOne workflow
OutputMap, gaps, PoC outline
Get the kit
Send yourself the diagnostic links.
Use the short request if you want the templates in your inbox and a lightweight record of who is mapping the workflow. The files remain public below for teams that prefer to inspect them directly.
Soft gate only: no confidential test data, no tool migration pitch, and no compliance claim.
Kit files
Browse files directly
Already want the files? Open the public templates without filling the form.
Workflow map Map actors, setup, tools, run steps, and evidence handoffs. Toolchain handoff map List where context moves between tools or people. Evidence gap scorecard Score setup, version, environment, logs, and reviewer context. PoC scope outline Turn the map into a narrow diagnostic or proof-of-concept scope. GitHub-ready kit README Use this index when mirroring the templates in a public repo or internal wiki.
Use cases
Use the kit for regulated workflow diagnostics.
Automotive HIL
ISO 26262 HIL traceability gaps
Map the setup, version, and evidence chain around one safety-related HIL workflow.
Aerospace evidenceDO-178C test evidence diagnostics
Use a diagnostic lens for verification evidence without making certification claims.
NI workflowsTestStand multi-station management
Find where station identity, sequence versions, and report context stop travelling together.
What to capture
Focus on context that makes a run reproducible.
Tool handoffs
Where LabVIEW, TestStand, Vector, dSPACE, OpenTAP, pytest, or scripts exchange context.
Review context
Pass/fail reason, evidence location, reviewer notes, and known uncertainty.
Next step
Have one workflow worth mapping together?
Bring the completed kit to a workflow review and we will help identify whether a diagnostic workshop is a fit.